That disconnect is a large part of how the systematic inequalities persist (& not just in marches).
-
-
And I think there's a POSITIVE DUTY to address them in one's org, even among folks who didn't create them.
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @docfreeride @OtherSociology
I understand, and I make the distinction because I think it's harder to fix when people think they're ok.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @JacquelynGill @OtherSociology
Yeah, people who think they're OK find the complaints mysterious. Could look at complaints as data, but …
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @docfreeride @OtherSociology
Or frustrating. "How can they say that, we're very committed to diversity!"
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @JacquelynGill @OtherSociology
How is that commitment manifest? What empirical facts mark this as world where they're committed vs. not?
2 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @docfreeride
Truth. Commitment to equity & diversity is proactive. Allyship is hard work we can see. That's not
#ScienceMarch@docfreeride@JacquelynGill1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes -
Just want to come in here and say I'm still trying to do right on the inside (though I only 1/
1 reply 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @kejames @OtherSociology and
2/ have the power to comment, feed back, and propose ideas, not really DO anything.
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @kejames @OtherSociology and
3/ mostly I am staying to support those inside who are trying to help the March get it right.
1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes
Thanks for sharing @kejames! Seems like the prob is organisation is not structured for inclusion. @docfreeride @JacquelynGill #marginsci
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.