Doubling down on sexism in science @todayinsci! "3% of Nobel are women so we only cover 3% women. That's history"
https://twitter.com/todayinsci/status/841448108995280896 …
This Tweet is unavailable.
What "numbers" are you referring to @todayinsci? You picked @NobelPrize figure of 3% to justify sexism. Nobel is not the correct yardstick
-
-
There's opp. to improve F sci rep.
@OtherSociology, w/this (fairly) ptd out, perhaps pt@todayinsci to alt resources?Can we make this a win? -
Think you're trying to be helpful
@MJBiercuk but 1) you're asking a WOC to do more unpaid labour as if it's my job...@todayinsci#marginsci -
only been following you a few days, just wanted to say thanks so much for your insightful engaging fascinating Tweeting
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable
-
History is men's business Dr Heidi! So we'll just take our PhDs and slink back into science obscurity, thank you very much.pic.twitter.com/Oefb8sKxHF
End of conversation
-
-
-
The Nobel was one available statistic. I'm open to your suggestion for another yardstick applicable to history.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.