But that's not really history @todayinsci. You don't only @NobelPrize winners.
Half of all science undergrads are women. That's reality.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Around the world a third of working scientists are women; in some countries & disciplines numbers are higher.
@todayinsci#marginsci -
Working scientists are not history yet. History is far different. Please name 100 female scientist in 19th century.
-
Here are 144 female scientists from the 19th Century to be getting on with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:19th-century_women_scientists …
-
Waited 15 minutes to tell you this as I gave this award out earlier. Now it's 12 AM: you win the internet today
@astronomyblog!@todayinscipic.twitter.com/tp4sWQ4JKg -
sad thing is - I wonder what account/blog you'll have to have the same convo w today
-
The truth level just went into hyper-drive right here.pic.twitter.com/63rEV5LEkc
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Numbers should be a lot higher, except sexist organisations
@todayinsci maintain the status quo & accept inequality in science as a given. - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Kudos for trying to justify sexism
@todayinsci but@NobelPrize is not the only way to measure & celebrate science history.#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And what's more
@todayinsci we are in Women's History Month. Plus@NobelPrize like other sci orgs celebrated women for#IWD!#marginsci - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Using small sliver of history to justify sexism is flawed logic
@todayinsci. Spend a little more time researching#WomensHistoryMonthThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're kidding right
@todayinsci? Because you're doing daily history it's 97% about men? "That's the niche." Is the niche sexism?#marginsci -
sounds more like "too lazy to do the hard research to find women father back". They existed.
-
I just tweeted 14 women in history at them! Their entire site is filled with White European men. "IFLScience!"
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Not change history. Report history." You are reporting biased history
@todayinsci. Nice work on defending sexism with sexism!@NobelPrize -
omg can we stop repeating recent history?
@todayinsci check the criticism of@ScienceMarchDC - start w Watson & Crick post
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What "numbers" are you referring to
@todayinsci? You picked@NobelPrize figure of 3% to justify sexism. Nobel is not the correct yardstick -
There's opp. to improve F sci rep.
@OtherSociology, w/this (fairly) ptd out, perhaps pt@todayinsci to alt resources?Can we make this a win? -
Think you're trying to be helpful
@MJBiercuk but 1) you're asking a WOC to do more unpaid labour as if it's my job...@todayinsci#marginsci -
only been following you a few days, just wanted to say thanks so much for your insightful engaging fascinating Tweeting
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
