2/ ...as I'm dealing exclusively w/ White male science editors (& only 1 WW) who say my "activism" detracts from my research... #marginsci
-
-
-
Yes! Established career scientists in editorial positions have power, should use it to open the gates not keep them closed
-
.
@OtherSociology Sci journal editors, be bold when articles like this come your way, your role in changing things for the better is critical -
Sci journal editors, also be diligent in sending articles to women, POC, early career scientists for review!
@OtherSociology#WOCinSTEM
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
3/ ...& the rest aren't interested in diversity in sci academia unless a White person writes about it abstractly "objectively."
#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
4/ Inclusion & access in science activities is important & not abstract. Diversity is not just "feel good" articles of hope...
#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
5/ Diversity work is tough; informed by research& activism; & not "biased" because the author is
#WOC are working on change.#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
6/ Science is political because White people can write articles on science activities WITHOUT talking about diversity.
#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
7/ Staying silent is political. And benefiting from the time, labour & activism of
#WOC w/o seeing this is also politics.#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Science is political - all day every day, in every way. From what is said about science, to who speaks & who is ignored.
#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Science is political because even when URM are experts, they will always be seen as biased by gatekeepers.
#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Science is political because organisers of the world's largest science march took WEEKS to admit that science is political.
#margsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And even then, they still say "I’ve not seen scientists be so willing to come out in to the street" https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/03/what-exactly-are-people-marching-for-when-they-march-for-science/518763/?utm_source=twb …
#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scientists have *always* protested - just not White scientists from dominant groups. URM scientists have always done this work.
#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So while glad the new
@ScienceMarchDC diversity statement finally says "science is political" it's taken LOTS of work by URM.#marginsci -
and thank you for that work!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Plus there are no specific plans or answers to URM questions. This is the 4th diversity statement not including social media.
#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It took 5 days for
@ScienceMarchDC to include#disability in its 1st diversity statement@crippledscholar http://buff.ly/2mRap5d#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Had they involved disabled scholars & activists in governance & planning from inception this would never have happened.
#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I remain supportive of few individuals working to make changes "from the inside" but organisers still show troubling patterns.
#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.