we apologize for how the tweet wasn't clearly written and was generating too much negativity. (3)
-
-
Replying to @march4sciencela
.
@march4sciencela@OtherSociology I think deleting the tweet but not replying to the concerns was disconcerting because creates the 1/n1 reply 2 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @STEMxicanEd
.
@march4sciencela@OtherSociology that you are not open to dialogue or accept that it was a poorly worded tweet. It is true that your 2/n2 replies 2 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @STEMxicanEd
.
@march4sciencela@OtherSociology intention was not to equate the calls for equity to violence BUT our biases can show in writing 3/1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @STEMxicanEd
.
@march4sciencela@OtherSociology unconciously and historically calls for equity are equated to violence to make seem that we 4/n1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @STEMxicanEd
.
@march4sciencela@OtherSociology don't have moral ground to ask for progress. Also is easy to say no politics when one is not 5/n1 reply 3 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @STEMxicanEd
.
@march4sciencela@OtherSociology not affected by opression by the science system and those are things that org are refusing to address 62 replies 3 retweets 5 likes -
our diversity committee is lead by an Hispanic, female scientist. We hope you'll still join us on Apr22!
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
I'll be more interested in seeing who is speaking.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
right we being in leadership and decision making positions matters too
1 reply 2 retweets 2 likes
Diversity committee for @ScienceMarchDC is separate from leadership & used as an excuse @pinkyprincess @hormiga @march4sciencela #marginsci
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.