1) @ScienceMarchDC Tweet about men who took credit for Rosalind Franklin's research. Get criticised by science community. #marginscipic.twitter.com/XHAimSzIVn
What to do when you're @ScienceMarchDC & get rightfully criticised routinely for reproducing marginalisation in sci? Do it again! #marginsci
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
2) 1hr later
@ScienceMarchDC tweets on Franklin. @seschaeffer962 notes link claims data stealing is myth https://twitter.com/seschaeffer962/status/836653389006123008 …#marginscipic.twitter.com/jj3y8SjfFl
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
3) Of all critiques
@ScienceMarchDC responds not to many women scientists but@WhySharksMatter who's excellent but notably a man#marginscipic.twitter.com/NEDzsYcPfF
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
4) Men should speak up on inequality! But telling that
@ScienceMarchDC, chose to speak to a man not women who continue to lead this critiquepic.twitter.com/Ul0Fz9wOkHThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
5) Despite hours of critique
@ScienceMarchDC RT same Franklin tweet. Defend original saying "character limit." Ignore critique.#marginscipic.twitter.com/coHBQsgtCW
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
6) And that's that.
@ScienceMarchDC tweeted more without replying to critique (already answered a man!). Did RT pic of cute dog.#marginscipic.twitter.com/qhhO5roFRP
-
Does it really matter what sex the tweeter was if the issue was addressed? You really think they're sexist?
-
The issue was never actually addressed either time. And uh yeah it was sexist. That's the point.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
7)
@ScienceMarchDC organisers have stated "Yes, this is a protest, but it’s not a political protest.”#marginscihttps://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/01/science/march-for-science-washington-date.html?_r=1 … -
wow what else would a protest be if not political. Y'all we really can't trust these ppl
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
8)
@ScienceMarchDC organisers have stated: "This isn’t about scientists. It’s about science." http://www.chronicle.com/article/March-for-Science-/239160 …#marginsci -
<head asplodes>
-
Unbelievable delusion that such a separation is possible. Science just hovers above us mere mortals.
@ScienceMarchDC@chronicle - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
9) Reason why
@ScienceMarchDC can say this is because organisers don't deeply understand history & current reality of science.#marginsci -
what is their average age? My views on science pretty unnuanced/naive when I started PhD; but I learned through listening.
-
Not quite an age thing as I see it. I see this about experience more so. May lack experience on divesrity issues & protests
-
yes that's true, but I also mean the stance that science is not itself a human creation, & is separable from scientists.
-
just thinking about how views about science itself as being 'beyond human' might influence attitudes to diversity.
-
(I'm sure this isn't original thoughts, just wondering about connections)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.