.@ScienceMarchDC Yesterday, many scientists, me included, sent MANY scientific references to show why this approach is flawed. #marginsci
.@ScienceMarchDC Here we are again. Same mess, 24 hrs later. "Hey 'females' in engineering who left; why'd you go?"https://twitter.com/ScienceMarchDC/status/834840542848679936 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@ScienceMarchDC Scientists discussed how myriad of STRUCTURAL barriers work to actively push women out of science.#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@ScienceMarchDC Scientists discussed the empirical evidence showing that leaving sci career is not individual choice by women...#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@ScienceMarchDC ...multiple cultural practices, policies and patterns of behaviour make women less likely to be rewarded in sci#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@ScienceMarchDC As the public voice of#ScienceMarch, organisers chose to ignore nuanced critiques & resources offered.#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@ScienceMarchDC The#ScienceMarch diversity statement only came about as an afterthought when White women, POC &URM critiqued..#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@ScienceMarchDC ..the very patterns we are seeing played out again yesterday and today: reductionist views of gender...#marginsci -
can I just say I applaud your patience and clarity in explaining these issuespic.twitter.com/Gg5Bh77Auh
-
Thank you sincerely! Oh how we'll laugh about these times...one day...Remember when we had to explain that women are people?pic.twitter.com/TqiKhZYzx6
-
I think you mean 'females'
-
Whoops! I mean "females" are people too! [Inserting evolutionary psych sexist nonsense]
#NotAllFemales@polargriffinpic.twitter.com/clSKv6XMNe
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
.
@ScienceMarchDC ...ignoring the informed perspective of URM & issues of#intersectionality that impact equity & diversity in sci#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@ScienceMarchDC First diversity statement forged haphazardly directly in response to critiques by@IBJIYONGI &@Hood_Biologist.#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@ScienceMarchDC Organisers even named them [2 early career POC] & said "we are going to do better." https://storify.com/othersociology/march-for-science-diversity-statements …#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@ScienceMarchDC Then came your diversity statement, critiqued by high profile White male. Many scientists called him out...#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@ScienceMarchDC GREAT you put out diversity statement! But your voice was not among those defending vs big name male scientist#marginsciThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
.
@ScienceMarchDC In fact, in every diversity conversation you start - you are absent.#marginsci -
this is such a perceptive point. It's all been reaction, scrambling to repair damage.
-
Exactly - damage control mode rather than stopping to reflect and bring the right people to help them plan. :/
-
it doesn't excuse the repeat errors, but I suspect they are overwhelmed by the volume of communication they are getting.
-
Several of team members respond to threads & private convos about diversity critiques. They collectively see. Choose not to act.
-
I agree, the response has been very disappointing
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.