On here? Ack.
-
-
Replying to @kejames
Yes,
@Enceladosaurus was talking about their response to accessibility ("later") & issues after the bit w@OtherSociology3 replies 4 retweets 11 likes -
"later?????" Seriously???
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @CatherineQ @rocza and
Yeah, I approached them repeatedly and was brushed off saying access wasn't a concern right now
3 replies 3 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @Enceladosaurus @CatherineQ and
Oh crap. That's bad. I'm sorry. When was that? At the very beginning?
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @kejames @CatherineQ and
yes and then my repeated requests were met with silence.
1 reply 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Enceladosaurus @kejames and
focus is on science right now. Once that's be sorted out, equality...
5 replies 4 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @DrRubidium
.
@DrRubidium@Enceladosaurus@kejames@CatherineQ@rocza Also#ScienceMarch:#Disability? Go away! We're not ready to think about that yet."1 reply 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @DrRubidium and
I'm a queer NB disabled person who volunteered help & they made active choice to
1 reply 3 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @Enceladosaurus @OtherSociology and
prioritize privileged voices & privileged needs.
1 reply 3 retweets 6 likes
Absolutely shameful @ScienceMarchDC Turning away expertise from queer disabled woman @Enceladosaurus @DrRubidium @kejames @CatherineQ @rocza
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.