Oh, the arrogance of white female grad students.https://twitter.com/seahlbrand/status/830041013288890368 …
She's inserted herself into 2 separate threads by WOC scicomm experts. To tell them how to do scicomm for under-served communities 
-
-
I know, I've been watching. It's astonishing. I tried, before she was SO awful, to tell her to step back & redirect anger
-
she should be taking it out on
@statnews, who threw her friend under the bus instead of killing a bad article -
instead she tried to lecture me abt how she knows b/c she attends a land grant uni...smack in the middle of a metropolis
-
Oh no, no, no. She's on another level. This person needs to go outdoors for a little bit. Think about professionalism a bit.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I'm just catching up on this myself but gracious! Quick Q: was thinking of writing article on scicomm but on..
-
.. How lots of funds are used to target already privileged spaces. I don't want to make the same mistake and erase
-
the hard work of PoC but rather show that many privileged scientists only outreach to privileged spaces.
-
apologies for my ignorance, but is this repeating the same mistake? If so, I'll make sure to shush and educate myself
-
I think if you do, the way to go about it is actively talking to POC who do outreach & see what they say
-
there are lots of ways to define privilege & financial allocation, too - for ex, affects disabled comm, too
-
I guess to sum, I'd like to tackle the q of "how can we scientists with white priv better serve URM via scicomm? "
-
Hmm. I prob wouldn't write that, TBH. I think it's up to underserved communities to tell us what's needed
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.