I'm not sure I like the messaging under 'reward' here. It implies women diligent vs intelligent or savvy? Cc @openresearchauspic.twitter.com/cgwgEGANWJ
The "confidence" message is also a myth Research shows women are penalised - confident = too assertive/aggressive
-
-
Yes
@OtherSociology certainly the case amongst my cohort of overly opinionated women...many who were marginalised by system @openresearchaus -
little unclear on who audience is... assume "it's ok if you don't understand" is for sensitive 'silverbacks'
-
This is @openresearchaus take on it. But it's actually *Not* okay to be ignorant of this phenomenon...evidence abounds
-
to rephrase another well-known aphorism, abundance of evidence does not guarantee abundance of understanding ...
-
Indeed @openresearchaus but this mild statement let's them off the hook? Ignorance is not a defence.
@StefanieTulloch -
by no means so - sometimes it's not amount of evidence but packaging and timing that gets through
-
Can u get thru to close minded folk who mouth lip service for PR benefits but genuinely believe opposite?
-
impt to be led from the top of organisations - by those who establish institutional tone & norms
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
similar language issues with SMH story today referred to
#womeninSTEM 'gaming' system, later changed to 'beating' -
Big complaint I hear from that awful marginalised group (silverbacks) is that women get to 'game' system @openresearchaus
@OtherSociology -
*awfully (although awful typo works as well!)
-
Wow and what a "game" it is, with such high casualties.
-
'You women, coming over here, stealing our board positions that were to top up our bloated pension funds!'
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.