#SciComm does NOT mean "give me more evidence" when evidence is abundant @Biotravis
-
-
Replying to @OtherSociology @michael_w_busch
Finally another reason I did not answer your question is because...
@Biotravis1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @michael_w_busch
...I've been running a national conference attended by 320 top scientists...
@Biotravis1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @michael_w_busch
...addressing this very issue: women make up half STEMM graduates in AUS...
@Biotravis1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @michael_w_busch
...but less 1/5 senior scientists; stat referenced in my post you quibbled
@Biotravis1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @michael_w_busch
To answer your question: how do I know girls want to work in STEMM?
@Biotravis1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @michael_w_busch
Because I manage the national program supporting women's science careers
@Biotravis1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @michael_w_busch
A fact easily seen on my bio. (BTW program is backed by science academies)
@Biotravis1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @michael_w_busch
Rest is up to you
@Biotravis You can continue to be defensive or step back & learn1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @OtherSociology @michael_w_busch
I won't engage further
@Biotravis unless you read my work & references within properly1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes
Can't cry in defense of #SciComm @Biotravis but choose to disbelieve women experts
-
-
Replying to @OtherSociology
thanks for an excellent thread! Where you did give an answer and data even if some will still choose to ignore.
0 replies 1 retweet 4 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.