But you aren't interested in women in science & I'll tell how you show this @Biotravis
-
-
#SciComm does NOT mean "give me more evidence" when evidence is abundant@Biotravis -
Finally another reason I did not answer your question is because...
@Biotravis -
...I've been running a national conference attended by 320 top scientists...
@Biotravis -
...addressing this very issue: women make up half STEMM graduates in AUS...
@Biotravis -
...but less 1/5 senior scientists; stat referenced in my post you quibbled
@Biotravis -
To answer your question: how do I know girls want to work in STEMM?
@Biotravis -
Because I manage the national program supporting women's science careers
@Biotravis -
A fact easily seen on my bio. (BTW program is backed by science academies)
@Biotravis -
Rest is up to you
@Biotravis You can continue to be defensive or step back & learn -
I won't engage further
@Biotravis unless you read my work & references within properly -
Can't cry in defense of
#SciComm@Biotravis but choose to disbelieve women experts - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.