-
-
Replying to @aline_marine
@alineffabile Honest question: does it make any difference that the paper was about gender bias in biology? Review was awful, but sexist?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @leighrobinson
@leighrobinson @alineffabile my immediate response is that you don't have to have cancer to write a paper on carcinogenesis (awful analogy).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @madamscientist
@madamscientist @alineffabile Again the review in general was terrible. Interested if asking for gender diversity itself sexist (and why?)2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leighrobinson
@leighrobinson @alineffabile I think it is sexist because it assumes that they cannot be unbiased scientists because of their gender.1 reply 2 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @madamscientist
@madamscientist @alineffabile No it adds a check to help be as objective as possible. These studies are not math. Experience is a factor.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @leighrobinson
@madamscientist @alineffabile I can't help but think gender bias studies would be helped by gender diverse authorship. Perhaps wrong...1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @leighrobinson
@leighrobinson @alineffabile Definitely wrong. Ask all the sociologists doing gender studies e.g.,@OtherSociology5 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@madamscientist @leighrobinson @alineffabile There is a wealth of research on this. E.g. http://www.nature.com/news/bibliometrics-global-gender-disparities-in-science-1.14321 … & http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0051332 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.