Psych researcher @davidimiller responds point-by-point 2 @OtherSociology’s critique of Williams & Ceci http://d-miller.github.io/PNAS-Debate/ #StillaProblem
-
-
Replying to @kejames
@kejames@OtherSociology We need to look at each context for whether it undermines or supports women@US_conversation http://theconversation.com/some-good-news-about-hiring-women-in-stem-doesnt-erase-sex-bias-issue-40212 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidimiller
@davidimiller@OtherSociology@US_conversation Fine, but at the moment, conclusions from this one aspect (hiring) are being used to… 1/21 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @kejames
@davidimiller@OtherSociology@US_conversation 2/2 gaslight all the other aspects of sexism in science, and W&C are holding the gas can.1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @kejames
@davidimiller@OtherSociology@US_conversation Again, I point to@mcshanahan’s post, especially this part:pic.twitter.com/ZUnYqHFIkQ
7 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @kejames
@kejames@OtherSociology@US_conversation@mcshanahan At the same time, grant apps, citations, and tenure show small sex diff's1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @davidimiller
@davidimiller Small? Really?@OtherSociology@US_conversation@mcshanahan5 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @kejames
@kejames@OtherSociology@US_conversation@mcshanahan Some exceptions, of course, like economics. Their 2014 review talks about those data1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
.@davidimiller Previous study by #GaslightingDuo was equally flawed as I show http://www.stemwomen.net/sexism-in-academic-science/ …. @kejames @US_conversation @mcshanahan
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.