What's the top comment on a Physics Today post about a new study on gender, race and perceptions of innate ability?pic.twitter.com/TSIwFLPhHT
.@IBJIYONGI Grrr! It's always "political correctness" when gender inequality is demonstrated even through scientific data.
-
-
@OtherSociology aka this guy would do very badly on a logic test where the words "woman" and "equal" are positively associated -
@IBJIYONGI@OtherSociology I made a point of liking other comments on that post. Head over to FB@PhysicsToday and show your support! -
@madamscientist@OtherSociology@PhysicsToday still not finding much to like. -
@IBJIYONGI@OtherSociology@PhysicsToday "What innate abilities are those? Aside frm breathing, etc most of what we do taught and practiced" -
@madamscientist@OtherSociology@PhysicsToday My point was partly: was maybe 1-2 good comments that were not worth subjecting self to rest -
@IBJIYONGI@OtherSociology@PhysicsToday True, sometimes I'm a glutton for punishment :) -
@madamscientist@OtherSociology@PhysicsToday Maybe worth mentioning "still top comment, also list of bad comments even longer" -
.
@IBJIYONGI@madamscientist@PhysicsToday Demonstrates what@STEMWomen argues: Science news sites do poor job of moderating sci discussion - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@OtherSociology@IBJIYONGI Although the researchers say "brilliance", their questions don't mention it, using "innate" gift" vs "effort". -
@OtherSociology@IBJIYONGI Notably, though, they pointed out there was "no evidence that fields with more women have weaker applicant pools"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.