Have @OtherSociology and @STEMWomen seen this shite?http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/11/02/opinion/sunday/academic-science-isnt-sexist.html?referrer= …
-
-
@OtherSociology Only because men more likely to have a stay-at-home spouse. If not, men pay the same price. Are SAH spouses sexist? -
MT
@akimbami "Only because men more likely to have a stay-at-home spouse.If not, men pay same price." Incorrect. See links already provided -
@OtherSociology I don't see links that show that single men with kids are not penalized in the same way as are single women with kids. -
@akimbami You seem disinterested in reading or learning. Read all the links I've provided, the studies I've linked to then we can talk. -
@OtherSociology I read your two pieces, but sorry I do not see any links that address reproductive issues. If you don't want to say, fine. -
.
@akimbami Married men full professors 5.9 years; unmarried men 6.4; unmarried women 6.7yrs; married women 7.8 years https://plus.google.com/u/0/b/110211166837239446186/110211166837239446186/posts/fUyczxsUpHf … -
@OtherSociology umarried men = unmarried women, but Married men < married women. What is the sexism that produces this disparity?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@OtherSociology We actually agree. We differ on the causes, but academia not addressing women's reproduction penalty is serious and wrong.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.