Have @OtherSociology and @STEMWomen seen this shite?http://mobile.nytimes.com/2014/11/02/opinion/sunday/academic-science-isnt-sexist.html?referrer= …
-
-
Replying to @IBJIYONGI
@IBJIYONGI I thought we had gotten through the "identify the problem" bit, but I guess not...@OtherSociology@STEMWomen1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mandaYoho
@mandaYoho@OtherSociology@STEMWomen my husband is looking at the study and@nytimes it is some shoddy fucking work2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @IBJIYONGI
@IBJIYONGI I also really enjoy the "girls just prefer working with living things!" bits.@OtherSociology@STEMWomen1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mandaYoho
@mandaYoho@OtherSociology@STEMWomen incredibly sexist undoubtably they have racist things to say but know better than to publish it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @IBJIYONGI
@IBJIYONGI and also could take the "we're talking about gender, not race" stance.@OtherSociology@STEMWomen1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mandaYoho
@IBJIYONGI If they dont get why those generalizations are problematic, I think intersectionality is a lost cause@OtherSociology@STEMWomen2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@mandaYoho Absolutely agree that intersectionality is missing! I've answered problems with study on @IBJIYONGI's original thread @STEMWomen
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.