Sociologist Giselinde Kuipers' work shows the many functions of humour. Cultures sometimes demand obligatory joking to release stress (e.g. during tense social interactions) or through rituals (e.g. carnivale) or specific roles (e.g. clowns) Jokes also enforce social control
-
-
Humour can reflect a worldview, such as what is considered 'natural' or 'normal.' Jokes about race, sexuality, gender, disability often rest on ideas of morality. Few jokes carry across cultures, but studies show that the few that do, evoke notions of rationality & modernity.
Show this thread -
Humour is also historical. Studies show that colonised societies have similar patterns of joking ('tall tales,' mocking class relations, practical jokes) that don't translate into other realms. In other coloniser societies like the Netherlands, jokes are more class-based.
Show this thread -
'Joking up' and 'joking down' reflect these complex dynamics, of social belonging, culture and history, even when the joker isn't fully aware of these functions. To know whether our jokes cause harm, taking a little time to reflect on what makes us laugh, is a useful exercise
Show this thread -
People who retreat into calls of censorship when they're called out for their jokes might consider why this is. They want laughter on their terms (social cohesion) but are unhappy to be denied laughs they feel they have a right to. They're likely 'laughing down' (social status)
Show this thread -
Finally, when considering whether to make fun of an issue affecting marginalised or vulnerable people, consider:
Are you a member of this group/ affected by this issue?
Are you laughing down? (Don't)
Does your joke offer relief, or reinforce the status quo?Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.