Who can joke about marginalisation & trauma without causing harm? The #sociology of humour is useful in unpacking relations of power
Humour plays on social observation, taboos & stereotypes to elicit laughter & reflection. Yet what's considered *funny* is culturally situated. 1/
-
Show this thread
-
Sociologist Giselinde Kuipers' work shows the many functions of humour. Cultures sometimes demand obligatory joking to release stress (e.g. during tense social interactions) or through rituals (e.g. carnivale) or specific roles (e.g. clowns) Jokes also enforce social control
1 reply 2 retweets 12 likesShow this thread -
A form of 'humour' is ridicule. It exists across cultures (working differently in different contexts) to 'correct' social transgressions. Sometimes, to remind people they've broken a social norm. Other times, to put people back in their place. Laughter reflects social hierarchies
1 reply 4 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
One study shows that during hospital meetings, staff 'laugh down': doctors can openly joke about residents; residents about themselves and nurses; nurses about themselves and patients. Not that they should, but it's manifestation of status: who is 'allowed' to 'make fun' of whom
1 reply 2 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
Humour is also about creating & maintaining social cohesion. A follow-up study of patients show that in more egalitarian settings with high trust, 'jokes' between patients and other hospital staff are more free flowing, but centred on their shared experience. Not 'laughing down'
1 reply 1 retweet 12 likesShow this thread -
'Laughter and humor are indeed like an invitation, be it an invitation for dinner, or an invitation to start a conversation: it aims at decreasing social distance' (Rose Laub Coser 1959). If that invitation is welcome (i.e. you're not laughing down) it's less likely to cause harm
1 reply 1 retweet 11 likesShow this thread -
Just as it fosters a sense of cohesion, humour also rests on exclusion. Some people get the joke because they belong (the joke is about and for 'us'). These three dynamics of humour (relief, control & cohesion) maintain the status quo. But what about challenging equilibrium?
2 replies 4 retweets 9 likesShow this thread
So far this makes sense. However, sociology studies show that in any given setting, how much people joke & who laughs are all dependent on status. High status members get more laughs & tell more jokes. Again, power makes a difference, showing jokes & jokers are not always equal
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.