Joker presents Arthur as an 'every man' whose poverty demands justice. It demotes Black women to stereotypes (https://www.huffingtonpost.com.au/entry/lets-talk-about-the-black-women-in-joker_n_5d9605dae4b0da7f6622abc7?ri18n=true …) Above all, Joker inverts gender & race in its 'social commentary.' Black women in USA & Australia are central to civil movements. Not in Jokerpic.twitter.com/X1Fw9sVUbA
-
-
Then there's the fact that the film evokes New York - which is 27.5% Latin, 25% Black, 12% Asian, among Others - but a White man is elevated to protest warrior
Joaquin Phoenix's performance is as commanding as everyone has been raving, BUT his portrayal is not without issuespic.twitter.com/cK49MGsisS
Show this thread -
Phoenix is very talented & could've rendered a profound performance if Arthur had simply been an angry, isolated man. But he was portrayed as disabled to give the filmmaker license on his violence, banking on accolade given to able-bodied actors using disability to gain sympathypic.twitter.com/PnNsZfEVRD
Show this thread -
Enjoy the film - I did, to a point - but don't mistake it as social commentary. It speaks only to White men who think the world owes them free reign; invites able-bodied people to cheer for caricatures of disability; & dresses up patriarchy as liberation. Joker does nothing newpic.twitter.com/7v9JruegwA
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't understand this. It's reminiscent of Scorcesse movies and a true work of art.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Those who judge reality (and the artworks included in it) according to race and gender are...__________ and... _________
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
, showing how White people are eager to assimilate Black excellence, esp in a film that undervalues Black women