I was at QandA audience tonight. Here's what I was thinking: Prof Megan Davis is a Member of the Referendum Council and Chair of the United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. In the Griffith Review, Professor Davis outlined the long road to the Uluru Statement. 1/
-
-
With all the history & *good faith* that led to the dialogues, is it moral, just and good governance for non-Indigenous leaders to justify another drawn out process for change; or is public funding and dialogue not better spent on simply implementing Voice, Treaty, Truth? 6/end
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.