This is a really bad take. 1. A job is something you get paid for. We aren't making money off our time on here. 2. If you post your experiences or science constantly having to justify them to a bunch of people who know very little about the topic is exhausting.https://twitter.com/Richie_Research/status/1156886103913316352 …
-
-
I didn't realise it was this bad else I would not have been as nice in my thread. I saw an academic I respect defending him so thought there must be some redeeming quality - clearly not! He's just wasting everyone's time and energy. And worse actively targeting WoC it seems.
-
This is his strategy: he appeals to "rationality" and uses academic discussions to reinforce hate speech. He does it by inching slowly: he starts by painting himself out to be "constructive" but then ends up attacking & reinforcing idea that minorities should accept abuse.pic.twitter.com/NVMLqwHOe1
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
. He sees hate speech as valid
But I'm the expert on gender. Not the WW and her followers, whom he was defending
He thinks price of public science is abuse. Nope 2/2