”Real quantitative” because math has no opinions sure sure surepic.twitter.com/np6WeWBr6n
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Me, an anthropologist: Have you considered that 'objectivity' is a myth and that literally all takes, including the quantitative, are socially positioned? Them: But ... but ... but numbers.
Also the social sciences & humanities have been studying social interaction since always. And social media since before it proliferated. So maybe... just maybe... quant methods aren't the real hero here? 
Amen. Related: I'm part of a team starting a big project on public understanding of quant stuff and (in)certainty in science: https://www.nsf.gov/awardsearch/showAward?AWD_ID=1906802&HistoricalAwards=false …
So interesting!
Also related: I'm constantly having to explain that qual is an expert skill. Everyone in my field thinks they can dabble... yet they're afraid of stats - would never dream of just trying a little quant (
). Many people fear maths but dismiss qual methods. 
Qual suffers because of its ostensible accessibility - it’s just talking and then highlighting sentences, right? By contrast even very basic quan can have appearance of complexity!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.