If you're hearing about all those hoax papers being published, it's important that you read this thread. Please.https://twitter.com/questauthority/status/1047463004663664640 …
This thread you've linked to is riddled with problems. How is a multi disciplinary peer review process going to improve fields where people aren't qualified experts? So-called 'grievance fields' is an attack on gender studies - is gender equity a 'grievance'? To whom & why?
-
-
Guess who does the bulk of the research, theory & practice to ensure the inclusion of people of colour, other minorities & White women? Not unqualified publicity-seeking 'grievance' artists. ALL disciplines have retraction issues & we're all working under the replication crisis
-
Thank you so much! I made a mistake. I saw it as a thread criticising the hoaxers' specific attack on gender studies journals, criticising their assumptions, motives, and ethics. I am sorry. I missed other problems that the current thread has. I completely agree with you
-
No worries. It's better to listen to social scientists on this. E.g. A useful thread by Prof McMillan Cottomhttps://twitter.com/tressiemcphd/status/1047469748500541441?s=19 …
-
Thanks!! That's brilliant
And thank you for your time, I see how much of your labour goes into this type of education. You're awesome and I have learned a lot from all your Tweets. Now I'm going to go away and read up 
-
I'm pretty sure I didnt retweet this thread on purpose (hello phone and big thumbs!) as I hadn't actually read any of this but have enjoyed doing so now and this thread was enlightening. Bang on as ever
@OtherSociology
thanks for your patience and time spent educating us all -
No worries and you're welcome.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.