Why #intersectionality is important: while #sociology of gender shows that gender structures can be undone (i.e. the inequalities that flow from how gender is organised), looking to transgender people as emblematic of how to do this is problematic in many ways. See my article
-
Show this thread
-
Back to the transphobic article in question: this White feminist uses phrase like 'trans ideology' to describe critiques of TERFs. Analyses of race and gender are 'pro-trans, pro-sex-work, anti-White Feminism' and therefore ''Tumblerised
#intersectionality,' 'dogma' & 'catechism'1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
The author, Jane Clare Jones, argues: 'intersectional feminism* functions to displace women’s oppression from the centre of feminism.' 'Women' here is centring *White cisgender* women as the rightful beneficiaries of feminism (*Incorrect term.
#Intersectionality is the theory)1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Jones then argues: '
#Intersectionality is used to bolster and reinforce trans activism’s efforts to undermine woman as a political category.' This is confused on many levels. Intersectionality is theory of how race + gender + other institutional disadvantages are compounded1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
To Jones, whose 'feminism' operates through whiteness (that is, White race is taken as the universal norm with institutional benefits that go unexamined), the critical race focus of
#intersectionality is erased. Instead, it is just a tool for what she calls 'trans activism'1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Next, Jones argues: 'there is something utterly (neo)liberal about both intersectionality and trans activism.' Bigots now use 'liberal' as a shorthand for 'I don't like social inclusion.' She argues
#intersectionality is about 'individuals' not structural inequality. That's false1 reply 0 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Jones mentions 'Crenshaw' by last name but doesn't link to Prof Crenshaw's work. Like many critics of
#intersectionality, Jones hasn't read the original, or she would see quite clearly it is expressly about structural inquality (industrial law case study) https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1052&context=uclf …1 reply 2 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Crenshaw argues: ''Black women are sometimes excluded from feminist theory & antiracist policy discourse because both are predicated on a discrete set of experiences that does not accurately reflect the interaction of race & gender.' Many miss this point about
#intersectionality1 reply 5 retweets 10 likesShow this thread -
I could go on, but sufficed to say that lumping
#intersectionality and TERF slurs of 'trans activism' miss the point. Transgender people have different race, gender, class & other experiences of inequity. Intersectionality is a theory that shines a light on these dynamics1 reply 3 retweets 9 likesShow this thread -
Finally, Jones twice uses a word she clearly does not understand, 'ahistorical,' to describe
#intersectionality. She argues 'feminism' has always dealt with race, 'which is not to say we’re good at it, we’re often really not.' It's critical who the 'we' is here: White women1 reply 0 retweets 7 likesShow this thread
Jones conveniently leaves out who brought together antiracism & feminism - and it wasn't White women. It was Indigenous, Black & other WOC. Jones' feminism is White feminism (how whiteness is used for exclusionary gender rights of WW), and it is also transphobic & dangerous.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.