Originally a term inspired by Orwell's 1984, groupthink is a #psychology term theorised by Prof Irving Janis to describe how members of a social group will value in-group cohesion and harmony, at the expense of new ideas or critical thinking when making decisions under stress. 4/
-
Show this thread
-
Groupthink leads to false optimism & risktaking; overconfidence in the morality of group norms; stereotypes; ignoring evidence that contradicts worldview; censorship; conformity; pressure to remain loyal; and self-appointed 'mindguards' gatekeep info. Let's come back to this. 5/
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
What causes groupthink? High social cohesion without exposure to outside members & ideas (say like in a private group for cisgender writers who exclude transgender people); homogeneity - e.g. lacking balanced leadership or methodological rigour (like excluding transpeople)... 6/
1 reply 1 retweet 8 likesShow this thread -
...and external threats, such as difficulties in decision-making or moral crises (e.g. cigender writers feeling anxious that transpeople are slightly more visible). A group that excludes transpeople but frets about their perceived encroaching power suffers from groupthink. 7/
1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
Groupthink applies to homogenous orgs & memberships. Janis examined decision-making by the Army. This
#BehaviouralScience term is NOT meant to be applied to heterogenous groups like transgender people, who come from multiple ethnic, racial, disabled & other social groups. 8/1 reply 1 retweet 4 likesShow this thread -
Transgender people's critiques of transphobic writing is NOT groupthink.* The private group in the Jezebel article IS groupthink, because influential cisgender writers reinforce one another's transphobic beliefs, use this to justify exclusion in the group, & externally. 9/
1 reply 1 retweet 5 likesShow this thread -
Let's come back to mindguards. These are group members who take it upon themselves to gatekeep information. Singal is an example. He uses his media platforms to spread a biased view of transgender people even though he's not an expert on transgender or other gender research. 10/
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Singal has a long history of transphobic reporting. He has shown up on my threads before, even though he's not tagged, not the subject of the discussion, and where I - as a sociologist of gender - have discussed methodological/theoretical problems with transphobic articles. 11/
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Mindguards see it's their personal quest to filter info that contradicts group values; to limit informed discussion; & narrow possible solutions for decision-making. Writing articles to infect parents with doubt about their transgender children is the function of a mindguard. 12/
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likesShow this thread -
It's irresponsible to use
#SocialScience research to discredit the lived experiences of marginalised groups. Conservative writers poach#BehaviouralScience ideas to serve their interests. Influential writers cocooning themselves from critical thinking is bad for the public. 13/1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread
To end, journalists, academics & writers must stop normalising transphobia & misusing #SocialScience to reinforce exclusion of minorities. They retreat into private groups b/c they know this is inexcusable, but this has broad consequences as they control information flows. 14/
-
-
*NB. (If there are homogenous transgender organisations making decisions - e.g. all White, or all able-bodied ignoring input from minority transgender people, which there are - then we might use groupthink to examine their choices. This is a separate but important issue.) 15/fin
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesShow this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.