This study is based on analysis of 23 cases of workplace sexual harassment that went before court. It helps us understand what strategies the judicial system rewards & how institutions maintain a culture of silence & inequality, by believing victims only in limited contexts.
-
Show this thread
-
Perpetrators of sexual harassment deploy multiple outrage tactics at any given time, often devaluing the survivor's work performance; undermining their moral worth; using censorship; diminishing the severity & impact of harassment; and using intimidation or bribery.
1 reply 6 retweets 7 likesShow this thread -
Most survivors are afraid to speak out for lear of losing their jobs & other retaliation. Most try to manage the problem by staying quiet as long as possible or by confronting their harassers directly. This doesn't work because harassers seldom cease without external pressure.
1 reply 4 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Survivors are scared no one will believe them & support them. Harassers count on this - critiquing survivors for taking too long to report ("if it's so bad, why didn't you speak up sooner?"), or they use swift reporting as proof that the psychological pain could not be so bad.
1 reply 4 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Sexual harassers paradoxically rely on official channels to excuse their actions after a victim reports harassment. "[Perpetrators] ...typically claimed the issue had been dealt with through formal procedures and, consequently, that justice had been served."
1 reply 4 retweets 4 likesShow this thread -
Eg. harassers will point to official policies as proof that harassment could not have taken place. Harassers will also use their "clean employment records" as evidence - no other cases of abuse exist, how could *this case* be harassment? The "good guy" defence is big in academia
1 reply 4 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Good policies are important - but they are not enough. They need routine & proactive evaluation. Harassers use their "model" reputations as pre-emptive armour to use against their victims. Don't let policies & prestige get in the way of women's safety.
1 reply 5 retweets 6 likesShow this thread -
Survivors use multiple tactics to defend their case. Most rely on EXPOSURE, alongside internal reporting & other strategies. Exposure includes telling friends, coworkers, managers, & media. W/o exposure, harassment is likely prolonged. Shouldn't be the case, but that's reality
1 reply 6 retweets 8 likesShow this thread -
Senior scientists who think there's a nice, "quiet" & "professional" way to deal with harassment are perpetuating a damaging myth. They don't act on reports through official process. They don't respond to collegial exposure hoping it'll die down. They jump only at media scrutiny
3 replies 18 retweets 39 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @OtherSociology
... like how nobody in
@SciMelb ever made a comment about Terry Speed?1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
Very much so. Also in the way that the Women in Science Parkville Precinct did not address Professor Speed's sexual harassment, even though he was on their board & gave presentations through their networks telling women how to increase gender equity, at women in science events.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.