There are many ways to do research. I disagree that # of papers indicates quality in either direction (neither less nor more is "more"). A 5 yr project w/ 20+ people won't necessarily make a good paper. Neither do multiple papers on a topic make an underlying idea less important.
-
-
-
I think what we as a community are missing / still iterating over is how and when to publish. Arxiv isn't always the best medium. Workshop or simple tech reports are also great instead of full blown conference or journal submissions.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
I totally agree with this, but is there a risk it's easy sentiment for you (and
@zacharylipton, and me, even) - who have worked hard to publish a lot and are now somewhat secure career-wise. How can you sell this idea to a student in the current climate? -
You have to balance quality and quantity, both as a student, faculty, well or not so well established researcher. *Precisely* due to the current climate, something of much higher quality will have higher chances of standing given the sea of papers that get published daily.
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.