Orin KerrOvjeren akaunt

@OrinKerr

Law professor at UC . Computer crime law and criminal procedure. Lawyer, but not yours. Co-founder, . "human scum!" --

Berkeley, California
Vrijeme pridruživanja: ožujak 2013.

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @OrinKerr

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @OrinKerr

  1. Prikvačeni tweet
    20. svi 2018.

    If Trump runs for re-election, I assume he’ll go to major efforts to create the reality — and if failing that, the false impression — that his opponent is under criminal investigation.

    Poništi
  2. You can't remove Trump from office because that would lead to a politics driven by spite and revenge.

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    No pictures allowed, but Justice Ginsburg is in the house to celebrate that the editors-in-chief of the Top 16 law reviews are all women. Oh, and Judges Pam Harris, Nina Pillard, and Sri Srinivasan are here too.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  4. Some say that you should clearly mark satire as satire, but I worry that ruins it for everyone else. As I see it, it's the internal process of reading the satire, recognizing it, and seeing the absurdity of the position echoed by others that makes it worthwhile.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  5. The problem with tweeting satire is that there's no way to signal to those who don't get it that everything's okay without ruining the humor for those who do.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  6. Let's end this impeachment trial so Congress can get back to its important work enacting public-spirited legislation and conducting oversight of the executive branch like the Founders intended.

    Poništi
  7. I suppose “always attack those in the other party, always defend those in your own” is a kind of principle.

    Poništi
  8. Poništi
  9. Oops, sorry -- Torres v. Madrid, no City in the case name.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  10. Petitioner's merits brief filed in Torres v. City of Madrid, on whether an application of force on a person to try to stop them is a 4th Amendment "seizure" if the effort is unsuccessful. Really cool case, hoping to blog about some of the issues soon.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. 2. velj

    Loosely translated, “Bloomberg is rising in the polls.”

    Poništi
  12. 2. velj

    In effect, court seems to be treating the "place to be searched" as the time over which the records relate, and requiring that the "place" be limited to those places where evidence is likely to be. It's like a warrant saying govt can search some parts of a house but not others.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. 2. velj

    I'm a bit puzzled by this ruling. The court seems to be imposing particularity ex post, after the records were obtained. And judge also takes an unusually strict view of particularity; I haven't seen a Carpenter warrant that had to be so narrow in time.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. 2. velj

    In murder case, warrant for historical cell-site info seeking location of D's phone for 18 days --starting 4 days before homicide and ending 2 weeks after -- was overbroad. Court narrows ex post to records from afternoon before and 24 hours after death.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. 2. velj

    "Inside Rudy Giuliani’s mission for Trump in Ukraine," a very interesting documentary from the .

    Poništi
  16. 2. velj

    My view: You shouldn't. It's unfair to your students, b/c they will feel pressured to accept your submission b/c you're at their school. And it's unfair to profs at other schools, as they can't compete w/you on the merits b/c of your inside advantage. Best to submit elsewhere.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. 1. velj

    Question for law professors: When you submit articles to law reviews, do you submit to journals at your home institution?

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. 1. velj

    Lawyers, like law students, have to answer hypotheticals. (Excerpt from a recent 6th Circuit argument available at the link.)

    Poništi
  19. 1. velj

    Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court clarifies when officers can order a driver out of car under the state constitution. (The 4A does not impose analogous limits, BTW.)

    Poništi
  20. 1. velj

    Next up, Kushner’s advice on getting in to a top college.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  21. 1. velj

    Unconditional loyalty to one man— it’s all it takes.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·