(Pssst, states don't control Federal monetary policy and are at the whim of Federal Regulations)
-
-
Replying to @OrdyPackard @KJ_Jeller and
If Kansas had its own currency and businesses didn't have to comply with Federal regulations in addition to state it would have. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KJ_Jeller @Ty_in_TX and
California's problems have to do with its spending programs and its regulations that go BEYOND what the Federal government requires. You can't roll back your regulations if they are *less* burdensome than the federal governments. How is this a mystery to you?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KJ_Jeller @Ty_in_TX and
You really don't understand the difference between Federal policy and State policy, do you?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KJ_Jeller @Ty_in_TX and
Kansas can't control how much is required to spend on Federally mandated programs the way the actual Federal government can. If the Federal government wants to cut spending on (x) thing to make an economic policy work, it can quite easily 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OrdyPackard @KJ_Jeller and
Kansas, however CANNOT decide to cut spending in (X) program if it has a mandatory Federal requirement to spend (Y) amount. Do you understand now or do I need to bust out the crayons for you?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Still don't understand the difference between when a Federal government enacts something like "trickle down" and when a state does it, do you?
-
-
Replying to @KJ_Jeller @Ty_in_TX and
I would have to research Kansas to make that determination and to see if what they were actually doing was "trickle down" or if you're just mislabeling a tax cut that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.