Actually, it did end the recession and put a computer in everybody's lap and cocaine was as plentiful and as cheap as water. Reagan failed by not reducing government spending. Otherwise it would have unequivocally worked.
-
-
Replying to @KJ_Jeller @Ty_in_TX and
(Pssst, states don't control Federal monetary policy and are at the whim of Federal Regulations)
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @OrdyPackard @KJ_Jeller and
If Kansas had its own currency and businesses didn't have to comply with Federal regulations in addition to state it would have. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KJ_Jeller @Ty_in_TX and
California's problems have to do with its spending programs and its regulations that go BEYOND what the Federal government requires. You can't roll back your regulations if they are *less* burdensome than the federal governments. How is this a mystery to you?
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @KJ_Jeller @Ty_in_TX and
You really don't understand the difference between Federal policy and State policy, do you?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KJ_Jeller @Ty_in_TX and
Kansas can't control how much is required to spend on Federally mandated programs the way the actual Federal government can. If the Federal government wants to cut spending on (x) thing to make an economic policy work, it can quite easily 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Kansas, however CANNOT decide to cut spending in (X) program if it has a mandatory Federal requirement to spend (Y) amount. Do you understand now or do I need to bust out the crayons for you?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.