Are you familiar with the concept of "incitement"? Not ALL speech can be unrestricted. Calling for genocide is unacceptable, obviously.
-
-
Replying to @OortCloudAtlas @makehacklearn
Granted. The only mention of “genocide” by the dissident right refers to their own. It has some validity.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MatthewAnsatz @makehacklearn
No. They are often casually making comments about ovens & gas chambers for their enemies. This is not protected speech.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OortCloudAtlas @makehacklearn
Granted, but don’t take them literally. They do it mainly to trigger, but incitement to violence should not be tolerated.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @OortCloudAtlas
I don't condone it, but I will certainly tolerate it because it's not incitement. How about you?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MatthewAnsatz
“Tolerate” when people talk of murdering & committing genocide? Tolerating that is the same as condoning. Tolerating it makes one complicit.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OortCloudAtlas
Michael, calm down, come to your senses: we must tolerate speech no matter how egregious. Civilization requires it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MatthewAnsatz
You are mistaken about the basics of civil discourse.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @OortCloudAtlas
How civil can a dialogue be when you throw out words like murderer, Nazi, witch, racists, etc?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
After reading your TL, I don’t think there’s any need to continue this conversation. Good luck to you, Matthew.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Sentient comet
Meditation freak
Teacher
Author
Podcaster
SF nerd
Serial comma enthusiast
Raised by wolves
Bad influence 