1. I’m not a fascist, so I don’t want to defend it. 2. My original question to @OortCloudAtlas was “Why are Western Buddhists SJWs?"
No. They are often casually making comments about ovens & gas chambers for their enemies. This is not protected speech.
-
-
Granted, but don’t take them literally. They do it mainly to trigger, but incitement to violence should not be tolerated.
-
Don't excuse it.
-
I don't condone it, but I will certainly tolerate it because it's not incitement. How about you?
-
“Tolerate” when people talk of murdering & committing genocide? Tolerating that is the same as condoning. Tolerating it makes one complicit.
-
Michael, calm down, come to your senses: we must tolerate speech no matter how egregious. Civilization requires it.
-
You are mistaken about the basics of civil discourse.
-
How civil can a dialogue be when you throw out words like murderer, Nazi, witch, racists, etc?
-
After reading your TL, I don’t think there’s any need to continue this conversation. Good luck to you, Matthew.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Sentient comet
Meditation freak
Teacher
Author
Podcaster
SF nerd
Serial comma enthusiast
Raised by wolves
Bad influence 