Preskoči na sadržaj
Korištenjem servisa na Twitteru pristajete na korištenje kolačića. Twitter i partneri rade globalno te koriste kolačiće za analize, personalizaciju i oglase.

Za najbolje sučelje na Twitteru koristite Microsoft Edge ili instalirajte aplikaciju Twitter iz trgovine Microsoft Store.

  • Naslovnica Naslovnica Naslovnica, trenutna stranica.
  • O Twitteru

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Jezik: Hrvatski
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • Ελληνικά
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Imate račun? Prijava
    Imate račun?
    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?

    Novi ste na Twitteru?
    Registrirajte se
Profil korisnika/ce Oneiorosgrip
Hannah Wallen has been misrepresented by Bloomberg
Hannah Wallen has been misrepresented by Bloomberg
Hannah Wallen has been misrepresented by Bloomberg
@Oneiorosgrip

Tweets

Hannah Wallen has been misrepresented by Bloomberg

@Oneiorosgrip

Managing editor: http://honeybadgerbrigade.com , contributor: http://avoiceformen.com , antifeminist/mra, gamer, unapologetic dork. http://Gab.ai/oneiorosgrip 

Don't blink. :)
breakingtheglasses.blogspot.com
Vrijeme pridruživanja: ožujak 2009.

Tweets

  • © 2020 Twitter
  • O Twitteru
  • Centar za pomoć
  • Uvjeti
  • Pravila o privatnosti
  • Imprint
  • Kolačići
  • Informacije o oglasima
Odbaci
Prethodni
Sljedeće

Idite na profil osobe

Spremljena pretraživanja

  • obriši
  • U ovom razgovoru
    Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
Predloženi korisnici
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @
  • Ovjeren akauntZaštićeni tweetovi @

Odjava

Blokiraj

  • Objavi Tweet s lokacijom

    U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više

    Vaši popisi

    Izradi novi popis


    Manje od 100 znakova, neobavezno

    Privatnost

    Kopiraj vezu u tweet

    Ugradi ovaj Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Dodajte ovaj Tweet na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Dodajte ovaj videozapis na svoje web-mjesto kopiranjem koda u nastavku. Saznajte više

    Hm, došlo je do problema prilikom povezivanja s poslužiteljem.

    Integracijom Twitterova sadržaja u svoje web-mjesto ili aplikaciju prihvaćate Twitterov Ugovor za programere i Pravila za programere.

    Pregled

    Razlog prikaza oglasa

    Prijavi se na Twitter

    · Zaboravili ste lozinku?
    Nemate račun? Registrirajte se »

    Prijavite se na Twitter

    Niste na Twitteru? Registrirajte se, uključite se u stvari koje vas zanimaju, i dobivajte promjene čim se dogode.

    Registrirajte se
    Imate račun? Prijava »

    Dvosmjerni (slanje i primanje) kratki kodovi:

    Država Kod Samo za korisnike
    Sjedinjene Američke Države 40404 (bilo koje)
    Kanada 21212 (bilo koje)
    Ujedinjeno Kraljevstvo 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Irska 51210 Vodafone, O2
    Indija 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonezija 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italija 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » Pogledajte SMS kratke šifre za druge zemlje

    Potvrda

     

    Dobro došli kući!

    Vremenska crta mjesto je na kojem ćete provesti najviše vremena i bez odgode dobivati novosti o svemu što vam je važno.

    Tweetovi vam ne valjaju?

    Prijeđite pokazivačem preko slike profila pa kliknite gumb Pratim da biste prestali pratiti neki račun.

    Kažite mnogo uz malo riječi

    Kada vidite Tweet koji volite, dodirnite srce – to osobi koja ga je napisala daje do znanja da vam se sviđa.

    Proširite glas

    Najbolji je način da podijelite nečiji Tweet s osobama koje vas prate prosljeđivanje. Dodirnite ikonu da biste smjesta poslali.

    Pridruži se razgovoru

    Pomoću odgovora dodajte sve što mislite o nekom tweetu. Pronađite temu koja vam je važna i uključite se.

    Saznajte najnovije vijesti

    Bez odgode pogledajte o čemu ljudi razgovaraju.

    Pratite više onoga što vam se sviđa

    Pratite više računa da biste dobivali novosti o temama do kojih vam je stalo.

    Saznajte što se događa

    Bez odgode pogledajte najnovije razgovore o bilo kojoj temi.

    Ne propustite nijedan aktualni događaj

    Bez odgode pratite kako se razvijaju događaji koje pratite.

    1. Brian D. Earp‏ @briandavidearp 21. velj 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      Okay ... one more thing that's come up. As noted, we found female participants rated boy pain higher & this was speculatively interpreted as evidence of sexism. If we'd found that men rated boy pain higher, I proposed this, too, would likely be interpreted as evidence of sexism.

      1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    2. Brian D. Earp‏ @briandavidearp 21. velj 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      And that made me wonder if - without some additional building-out of the theory - this raised a problem for some views of sexism in that they might be unfalsifiable (opposite evidence would be seen as equally theory supportive). But one tweeter suggested that the finding could

      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    3. Brian D. Earp‏ @briandavidearp 21. velj 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      have been 'opposite' along a different dimension: girl pain could have been rated higher than boy pain (by either men or women). True enough. Suppose we'd found that participants rated a girl as experiencing more pain than a boy given an identical display of pain. One possibility

      1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    4. Brian D. Earp‏ @briandavidearp 21. velj 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      is that headlines would have read, "Girls' pain is taken more seriously than boys' pain, contra sexism." Or, the finding could still have been interpreted as evidence of sexism: "Girls are seen as oversensitive to pain & not as tough as boys." So my point was just that, in our

      1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    5. Brian D. Earp‏ @briandavidearp 21. velj 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      study, we did not measure "sexism" nor design our experiment to be able to find evidence in favor of any particular conceptualization or operationalization of sexism. Had we intended to see whether sexist prejudice against girls would lead to different pain ratings for boys

      1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 11 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    6. Brian D. Earp‏ @briandavidearp 21. velj 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      versus girls given an identical display of pain, we (1) would need to have conducted a very different of experiment w a different design & different measures, including measures of, for example, endorsement of sexist attitudes (on some clear conception/theory of sexism), and

      1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 11 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    7. Brian D. Earp‏ @briandavidearp 21. velj 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      (2) we would have to have set up our hypotheses in such a way that, if the data turned out such-and-so, this could count *against* our hypothesis. By contrast, if, no matter which way the data came out, we could have found a way to interpret this as being consistent with

      1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 10 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    8. Brian D. Earp‏ @briandavidearp 21. velj 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      our particular theory/conceptualization/operationalization of sexism, then our hypothesis would not be meaningfully falsifiable and that would be a troubling feature. And based on the way the media coverage was playing out, it seemed plausible to me that, at least a popular 'lay'

      1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 9 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    9. Brian D. Earp‏ @briandavidearp 21. velj 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      theory of sexism, might indeed have elements that are unfalsifiable in the present context. E.g., the coverage from Jezebel (https://jezebel.com/girls-pain-taken-less-seriously-than-boys-study-confir-1832233139 …) seemed to just assume that the findings "confirmed" deeply entrenched sexism. But a single finding can't confirm any such thing.pic.twitter.com/7PEJ8n4EJW

      1 proslijeđeni tweet 19 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
    10. Brian D. Earp‏ @briandavidearp 21. velj 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet

      For more on falsifiability in the context of findings in psychology, see my paper with David Trafimow:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00621/full …

      5 proslijeđenih tweetova 34 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
      Prikaži ovu nit
      Hannah Wallen has been misrepresented by Bloomberg‏ @Oneiorosgrip 22. velj 2019.
      • Prijavi Tweet
      Odgovor korisniku/ci @briandavidearp

      I wonder if the socialization of girls to express their pain vs the socialization of boys to "tough it out" might have contributed to your study's results. We learn we're expected to complain if hurt, and that boys generally won't. By the time we are adults...

      09:00 - 22. velj 2019.
      1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 0 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
        1. Novi razgovor
        2. Hannah Wallen has been misrepresented by Bloomberg‏ @Oneiorosgrip 22. velj 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet
          Odgovor korisnicima @Oneiorosgrip @briandavidearp

          ...it might make sense for a woman to view the same level of complaint as indicative of different levels of pain depending on whether the individual was female (raised to complain) or male (raised or maybe even naturally inclined to not complain.)

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        3. Hannah Wallen has been misrepresented by Bloomberg‏ @Oneiorosgrip 22. velj 2019.
          • Prijavi Tweet
          Odgovor korisnicima @Oneiorosgrip @briandavidearp

          I say "or maybe even naturally inclined" because this is what I observed in my brother when we were kids. During early childhood he hit a point where he began disregarding pain if its cause didn't appear threatening to him. His friends were similar, but not to the same degree.

          1 reply 0 proslijeđenih tweetova 1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
        4. Još 1 odgovor

      Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

      Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

        Sponzorirani tweet

        false

        • © 2020 Twitter
        • O Twitteru
        • Centar za pomoć
        • Uvjeti
        • Pravila o privatnosti
        • Imprint
        • Kolačići
        • Informacije o oglasima