Nah, that's just your take on it. A false comparison is a false comparison. Wolf was just being dismissive & using a false comparison as an excuse.
-
-
Replying to @Oneiorosgrip @fatbonkrips
ok, prove it is a false comparison.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jedimaster3883 @fatbonkrips
You're comparing personal preference to actual nerve stimulation. They're not even necessarily related.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Oneiorosgrip @fatbonkrips
aaaand, thats exactly what the article did too. the article was not just about nerve stimulation.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jedimaster3883 @fatbonkrips
Actually, it's not - your initial response characterized the study that way, but in reality it was mostly about nerve stimulation and sexual dysfunction. Preference didn't even factor into the researchers' conclusions, which you misquoted.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
All around, you only demonstrated that you're more interested in promoting the procedure as it's currently used than honestly approaching information that could contraindicate its continued practice.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Oneiorosgrip @fatbonkrips
but anyways, the health benefits for circumcision are as follows.pic.twitter.com/JugLsb5yKy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jedimaster3883 @fatbonkrips
All of those claims have been repeatedly discredited - hygiene isn't an excuse to cut flesh off of an infant. UTIs & phemosis are preventable in other ways that don't involve cutting off flesh. Circumcision doesn't actually decrease the risk of STDs.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Oneiorosgrip @fatbonkrips
well, that is from mayo clinic. so you will have to take it up with them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @jedimaster3883 @fatbonkrips
Actually, I don't. The U.S. Navy's research discredited the research that the Mayo clinic is relying on for its HIV claim. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a458066.pdf … You've made a fallacious appeal to authority. A source for a claim doesn't validate cutting infants' flesh off for easier hygeine.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You should be able to recognize bad methodology. The studies on which the claim that circumcision reduces HIV risk are based attributed the benefits of post-procedure abstinence & condom use to the procedure rather than those behaviors, which are already proven preventatives.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.