Ruth Shalit may not produce good journalism. But much good journalism has been produced about Ruth Shalit. I look forward to more in the coming days. David Carr, 1999:https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/273495/goodbye-to-all-that/ …
-
-
Show this thread
-
More than one person, upon seeing the above screen shot and the name Barrett, has tweeted at me under the assumption that The Atlantic is referring to Amy Coney Barrett rather than Ruth Shalit Barrett.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It is hilarious
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Editor’s Note: After The Atlantic published this article, new information emerged that has raised serious concerns about its accuracy, and about the credibility of the author, Ruth Shalit Barrett.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Circular logic is circular.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This whole correction is amazing
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What’s the “coward’s ratio” equivalent term for the correction being longer than the article
-
Nah, it's a short long article
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Olivia.Nuzzi@NYMag.com