In most cases, the beauty of a free and diverse press is that, if you disagree with something that’s been published, you can publish a rebuttal. Or you can mock the author of the piece. Or you can just fucking ignore it.
-
-
Show this thread
-
I am a radical when it comes to the free press. I think most reporters are. I don’t think you can believe in radical first amendment freedoms and also believe that some stupid little fucker’s column is too dangerous for people to read.
Show this thread -
I don’t think it’s controversial to believe that reporters should always be on the side of putting more information into the public sphere about how public officials think. This is true also when the public officials in question think dumb fucking thoughts.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do you place any limits on this? Calling for genocide okay as long as you run a counter-argument?
-
Not to mention, the Times let this stand alone.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
cool. who do I need to email my opinion piece to at the NYT or WaPo?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Some things are not mere opinions. Would you welcome a piece on the genetic and moral inferiority of women? Some things are well beyond mere discourse.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Every paper makes decisions about what to publish. They're called editors. Are you seriously suggesting any fascist deserves to have 800 words in The Times?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Olivia.Nuzzi@NYMag.com