U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
The CO2 removal debate is obsessed with potential large-scale deployment (as indicated by Integrated Assessment Models), suggesting a need for grand governance designs.
In @NatureGeosci November issue, @DrRobBellamy and I argue for a different approach
http://rdcu.be/bVzjf
1/pic.twitter.com/UZSCSMiTut
Sure, IAM scenarios trying to achieve stringent climate targets like 1.5 or 2°C use a lot of CO2 removal (#IPCC #SR15 median is 730 Gt in 21st century), to offset hard/impossible-to-abate residual emissions and to rebalance carbon budget overshoot...
http://rdcu.be/bVzjf
2/pic.twitter.com/OCVHEVQEeb
... but that doesn't mean only policy designs capable of delivering 730 Gt CDR are worth thinking about.
One major reason is that CDR volumes will depend on conventional mitigation pathways, as highlighted in #IPCC #SR15 SPM...
https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/ …
http://rdcu.be/bVzj
3/pic.twitter.com/6Li6HJPcW4
Terrific article. Wish I could have written it. Keep up the good work.
Thanks. Some people write articles, but others get actual CDR installations on the ground. I guess the latter slighty is more important.
I completely agree with you
We need to start small, learn, stumble, get up, proceed, scale then we can grow. So start doing something.
And secondly as you pointed out there are other advantages.
I.e. @greenSandco2 replacing conventional sand/pebbles towards CO2 neutralpic.twitter.com/Ocb1MguLqO
Very insightful piece! I do think scenarios which rely on "social engineering" could (mistakenly) look like an easy alternative to decision makers. But isn't it key to include lifestyle changes in scenarios? Social awareness 
pressure on government and companies more action.
this is absolute madness. how much could it cost and where to store these huge amounts. at the same time more co2 will be released by china and co
Underlines the relevance of small, remote energy systems where technologies can be implemented and developed with relatively low risk. "The predominance of the small". I Ching.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
