OffGuardian

@OffGuardian0

We read the Guardian so you don’t have to 🕯️

Joined April 2015

Tweets

You blocked @OffGuardian0

Are you sure you want to view these Tweets? Viewing Tweets won't unblock @OffGuardian0

  1. Pinned Tweet
    9 Dec 2018

    He's right, it IS curious that 100,000s of people are violently protesting austerity in the heart of a European capital city and not a SINGLE outlet is live-streaming it.

    Undo
  2. 40 minutes ago

    Those cunning spies are at it again, this time spreading discontent to the prosperous and happy working people of via the ’s covert international espionage network of world renowned concert pianists.

    Undo
  3. 3 hours ago
    Undo
  4. 13 hours ago
    Undo
  5. 19 hours ago

    "What gives" is that you're deliberately taking her words out of context in order to imply racism on her part, because you can't rationally refute her argument. Pathetic debate technique.

    Undo
  6. 19 hours ago

    Important and fascinating work being done by on this topic. Note the language. Anyone else reminded of "absent some catastrophic and catalysing event"?

    Undo
  7. Retweeted
    Jan 4

    UK state is in a bind. It can't find enough canon fodder in UK. While the ground forces it increasingly relies on to fight its foreign wars (Libya, Syria, Kosovo) are lunatic jihadists. The dilemmas of a declining power.... via

    Undo
  8. 22 hours ago

    Well, those meant good money for someone - I wonder who the beneficiaries of this investment will be. Same exact business model as anti-virus software - 80% of computer viruses were created by people who want to sell anti-virus software.

    Undo
  9. 24 hours ago
    Undo
  10. 24 hours ago

    "Break neck speed", in this instance, meaning waiting 6 months while a Russian national is held without consular access, in solitary confinement.

    Undo
  11. Retweeted
    Jan 3

    A handful of rich people in the US are shaping government policies to make themselves richer and the rest of us poorer. But you never hear about it because they literally own the media. Does that sound like a democracy to you?

    Show this thread
    Undo
  12. Retweeted

    NEWS FLASH: The doesn't get to decide what does in . Syria does.

    Undo
  13. Jan 3

    The Soviets were invited into by the socialist government there. They were fighting terrorists, funded and armed by the . It was a tragedy for the whole country, especially the women, that government and their soviet allies lost that war.

    Undo
  14. Jan 3

    That’s s bleak. When I saw “woke Bill Kristol”, I thought they were joking. But no, they really are rebranding Bill “never met a war I didn’t like” Kristol as some kind of progressive.

    Undo
  15. Jan 2
    Undo
  16. Jan 2

    It’s almost sad - the silence screams out. If they had any evidence, or even a decent excuse, we’d have seen it by now. They have nothing, and they’re just desperately hoping people simply stop talking about it.

    Undo
  17. Jan 2

    They’re far from incapable of doing their job, Chris. You just don’t realise what their job actually is. The are owned, for the most part, by 6 media conglomerates. Their job is to protect corporate interests at all costs. They are very good at it.

    Undo
  18. Retweeted
    Jan 2

    American mythology classic: the Soviet "invasion" of Afghanistan, rather than the Soviet intervention at the repeated express invitation of the beleageured socialist govt of Afghanistan under seige by the US/Saudi/Pakistani-backed jihadists that would become the Taliban & AlQaeda

    Undo
  19. Jan 1
    Undo
  20. Jan 1
    Undo
  21. Jan 1
    Undo

Loading seems to be taking a while.

Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

    You may also like

    ·