It’s super fun when a client is trying to design via committee because the feedback never. Ever. Ends.
-
-
-
I can see how that can be annoying. But, this reasoning tend to result in another fallacy; the thinking that not having a committee will automatically mean you'll have a genius at the rudder. This is rarely the case.
- Još 3 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
every meeting, some dude always wanted to put in QR codes. like in print media. not even in a native app. i wanted to cri every time
-
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
C. Northcote Parkinson defined the Coefficient of Inefficiency: membership exceeding a number "between 19.9 and 22.4" makes a committee manifestly inefficient (Parkinson's Law: The Pursuit of Progress, 1958). This was later proven empirically: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009PhyA..388.3939K …
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
I spent the first chunk of my creative life as a costume designer. Every day was a multi-person design meeting. I'm a painter now. And I don't do commissions. Buy what I paint, or fuck off. The committee has adjourned, permanently.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Lol. I have two dogs. And still...pic.twitter.com/t3eVPEqqNT
Kraj razgovora
-
-
-
I call it reciprocal, i.e. inverse. Goes for tourists abroad as well. If 1 tourist is intelligent, 2 tourists are half intelligent, 4 are quarter, etc. I observe that every day when riding my bike through Berlin: Groups become dumber the bigger they are
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.