0.1% growth in #GDP per head in Q1 2018 http://ow.ly/N6NB30kIKkX pic.twitter.com/ZptASzYeMA
Deze collectie tonen
0.2% growth in #GDP Q1 2018, 0.1 percentage point upwards revision from the previous estimate due to later construction data, and significantly improved methods for measuring the sector http://ow.ly/N6NB30kIKkX pic.twitter.com/weWgUfVNOD
-
-
-
Commenting on today’s GDP figures, Head of GDP Rob Kent-Smith said http://ow.ly/p9pt30kIKvg pic.twitter.com/Qb1Z1HzQ85
Deze collectie tonen
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
So it went from 0.1% to 0.2%. Is that a 50% error or a 100% error?
-
100% uplift. Twice as much. Double original estimate. However, the number is so small it’s de minimis however it’s described.
-
It’s a 50% error if you go from .2 to .1 100% if you go from .1 to .2
-
Agreed. De minimis was not referring to the margin of error but the number on which the margin of error referred.
-
I was making an ironic comment that at best the ONS were in error by 50%.
-
Both missing each other’s irony. How ironic
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
-
-
Small rise at least, but should (and needs to be) be higher.
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
So economy not quite down and out yet in spite of efforts to talk it down. Unemployment at record lows and vacancies remain high
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Bedankt, Twitter gebruikt dit om je tijdlijn te verbeteren. Ongedaan makenOngedaan maken
-
-
-
Why do you publish this data early as you always revise it. These stats are used politically but are never corrected politically. We see out of date stats repeated by various politically parties if it is to their advantage.
-
I agree with your statement and assessment. I'm sure if the result was going to be excessively positive, they would have held the results until 'all the data was in'. Its always easy to sell bad news.
Einde van gesprek
Nieuw gesprek -
Het laden lijkt wat langer te duren.
Twitter is mogelijk overbelast of ondervindt een tijdelijke onderbreking. Probeer het opnieuw of bekijk de Twitter-status voor meer informatie.