I don't think any piece of art has an inherent right to an audience, I really don't But I also don't think that blockbusters—or any works of art—have a right to a suffocating monopoly on people's attention
-
-
Show this thread
-
Honestly the fact of the matter is that if we all had a UBI, art would be better, there would be more of an audience for it, and middle-budget art across all media would be more accessible, both to make and to peruse There wouldn't be this wealth gap in artistic labor
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Scorsese tried it
he wasn't wrong, either. -
It would help if he had a better movie to gripe about than the shitty one he made
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
more independent films are made than blockbusters every year and the blockbusters help to fund them. Independent films are also a gateway for new talent. It's a perfect symbiosis.
-
lol no it isn't
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
“every media” is right. i often think about david bowie’s decision to make “let’s dance” back in 1983, because so far as i’m aware, it was made for similar reasons to the ones patterson gives.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
《she/hers》 Most blocks are via chain; you may tap a friend to appeal.