Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @NuriSparks

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @NuriSparks

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 5 sati
    Odgovor korisnicima

    COS, Guptas, MCKinsey, Trillian etc are the guys who collected millikns and billions. Their Black hangers-on and enablers collected the crumbs.

    Poništi
  2. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 4 sata
    Odgovor korisnicima

    These people are disrespectful to the judiciary they only react and criticize the judiciary when they assume that Zuma is being treated unfairly and yet everyday ordinary SAns can’t even access justice

    Poništi
  3. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 5 sati

    Who benefits from criminalizing hard working street traders/hawkers in South Africa? Not forgetting that over 50% of the unemployed in this country are young people. Politicians who draft these ridiculous bylaws don't even know what hard work looks like.

    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    True, Her days in that office are numbered. These frivolous court applications won't work.

    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    So if he knew who I was and who I am he would have declined that offer from his handlers.

    Poništi
  6. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    True and that's why I would always quip that they fought against apartheid in order to oppress us on their own terms.

    Poništi
  7. proslijedio/la je Tweet

    I was reading your tweets, responding to my comments on former President yesterday. I know we can differ in our views, but does it mean that some of you must be so emotional and end up being disrespectful?Why can't we debate without insults?Or accept that i have a different view

    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    Odgovor korisniku/ci

    Well said Nobhala. Our cadres lack discipline, something that need to be reinforced in the branch level. People must be held accountable for their actions. We must always accept notions of democracy about freedom of speech, to agree to disagree. Above all RESPECT of one another.

    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 11 sati

    Are we really ready for ? A South African returned from China with symptoms and was turned away without testing and given a panado! Another says she was told there was no way to test her! How long before a confirmed case?

    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    but that it was called off at the highest level because it was felt that the matter was before the courts.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    “The M&G has now established from different sources in the government that the SANDF had been considering an investigation into the sick note handed in to the court during the week,

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  12. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    “Mantsha had not responded to requests for comment about when the presurgery assessment was conducted, by which anaesthetist, and who had cleared Zuma to fly after two surgeries.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  13. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    “On this schedule, Zuma would have been hard pressed to attend court on February 4.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  14. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    “The timing of Zuma’s travel dates to Cuba, with him departing on January 27, would have left him with roughly four days to undergo his medical treatment and recuperate before travelling back to South Africa.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  15. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    “During the week of January [7] president Zuma underwent two surgeries and given his age and the fact that he didn’t recover much quicker … that affected the time of departure on the 23rd of January … He eventually travelled on the 27th of January,” Mantsha told the court.

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  16. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    the Mail & Guardian can reveal that the former president’s travel date of January 27 was finalised as far back as the second week of January and was not a last-minute decision.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    “Although Zuma’s lawyer, Daniel Mantsha, told the court that Zuma had undergone two surgical procedures on January 7 and 9 and could not travel on January 23, when he was supposedly meant to go to Cuba,

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  18. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    “Among the concerns raised by Judge Dhaya Pillay were its vague nature and the fact that dates appeared to have been altered, without a corresponding signature from the issuing doctor.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  19. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    “The doctor’s note, presented to the Pietermaritzburg high court by Zuma’s lawyers this week, was deemed to be insufficient proof of the former head of state being indisposed.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  20. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    prije 8 sati

    “Former president Jacob Zuma’s questionable medical certificate has raised sufficient concern within the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) to prompt the possibility of an investigation into the document.”

    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·