His problem: It's never been high. Not once. Reagan, Clinton, and Obama has some reservoirs of goodwill to recover once their economic expansions continued and gained strength. Imagine where Trump will be if and when growth stalls.
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Context is required. Pre-Obama polls were in less polarizing times, and those numbers all moved with facts on the ground. Trump’s 43% is his base, his floor, and his ceiling.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Of course by the time their respective 2nd term elections rolled around, Obama was at 50% in Gallup, Bill Clinton was at 54%, Trumps not getting there.
-
What if he gently but firmly makes love to Kim and reunifies Korea? That has to be worth at least 7 points right?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
So, anything north of 30 or south of 70 gets a president reelected
-
Now there’s some useful data mining
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Well it’s clear that 40% of this nation does not give AF about competence or decency or the deficit or really anything other than owning libs.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yet historically bad once considering he has a strong economy of 9 years straight growth.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Trumps numbers don’t move. People love him, but more hate him.
-
An even larger contingent are too afraid of the haters to even admit they’re indifferent.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.