Am I the only one that worries that "GitHub Sponsors" will make free software development less cooperative and more transactional?
-
-
Replying to @MDroettboom
Not the only one. The entitlement effect of donors on maintainers will also be interesting to watch.
1 reply 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @pwang @MDroettboom
This is why I resisted all attempts to monetize my projects. I want users and collaborators, not customers. Piping money through
@NumFOCUS et al probably helps, though.1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
That entitlement can be a good thing though. There is loads of open source software used for mission critical things that is low quality in various ways. Yes, taking money will increase expectations of professionalism. Not good for some projects, great for others.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @davekammeyer @leouieda and
In my experience it's *time* that leads to professionalism more than anything else, and there are no shortcuts. $$ can create time, of course, but only under very narrow circumstances, even less so for "small" money.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MDroettboom @davekammeyer and
From companies or individuals, "in kind" donations are always going to be more effective at improving open source, IMHO.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MDroettboom @davekammeyer and
I imagine something like Google Summer of Code does more for a project than a one time donation. Dif you find that to be the case with matplotlib?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
NumFOCUS launched our small development grants program in 2017 on the success of our individual giving campaign that year (including one-time donations). The program has essentially purchased the time of developers to make code improvements:https://numfocus.org/programs/sustainability#sdg …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.