Scientific software differs meaningfully from software as a service; therefore, "we must value the skills and the people as integral to the research process." ~@tracykteal
#SciPy2018pic.twitter.com/KfS7FR1kkj
Show this thread
How can we value developers?
-Giving credit for software & good software dev't practices
-Career paths for research software development
-Information or access to resources on best/better practices (Checklists! Templates!)
-Pay for open source software development
#SciPy2018pic.twitter.com/oFmtHCsCgU
-
-
"When people are expected to work on open source for free, only the people who can afford to work for free can participate." ~
@fperez_org@tracykteal makes the point why it's so important to pay for open source software development in her#SciPy2018 keynote#opensourcepic.twitter.com/nXHMWyflFy
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
In the pyramid structure of open source contribution and development, those at the top — maintainers — are often under heavy responsibilities with no or minimal funding.
#SciPy2018pic.twitter.com/uvdEtWv5Jp
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.