Conversation

Not to mention how much more effective he most likely could have been if he DID have a gun. More might have been spared and the shooter may not be on the run.

Quote Tweet

Ben Shapiro

@benshapiro

Apr 22, 2018

I am so confused why gun control advocates see this is some sort of dispositive point. Should we disarm police officers based on this idiotic argument? twitter.com/sethmacfarlane

3:24 AM · Apr 23, 2018

Replying to

and

They just can't help themselves when reacting to a shooting, most of them are probaly typing immediately after hearing about it, not even taking 30 seconds to think about it.

This Tweet was deleted by the Tweet author. Learn more

Farmer

@ShawnDashiell1

Apr 23, 2018

Yep, exactly

American Conservative

Replying to

and

I’m glad you guys are just as baffled. I gotta get off Twitter for a week and recover.

Replying to

and

isn't it equally as valid to take the opposite position -- guns aren't even deadly enough to worry about, people can take them down unarmed

Replying to

and

Waffle House is so small and cramped that the guy with the AR might've been at a disadvantage. Thankfully he didn't choose a spacious IHOP!

Replying to

and

That's what I have said multiple times. As small as Waffle House if even one person would have been armed and trained that shooter would have been dropped immediately and a lot less people would have been hurt.

Caleb (Blue Checkmark)

Replying to

and

It also inadvertently puts the responsibility of the attack on the person and not the weapon