oh my gods. they literally have no shame about this. GitHub Support just straight up confirmed in an email that yes, they used all public GitHub code, for Codex/Copilot regardless of license.pic.twitter.com/pFTqbvnTEK
Diesen Thread anzeigen
-
And whats the difference? Their software isn't going to reproduce any of the code its read unless it's trivial code, which can't be copyrighted anyway
That's not even a little bit true - it's reproduced, for example, the fast inverse square root from DOOM. Nontrivial, high entropy, and GPL.https://mobile.twitter.com/mitsuhiko/status/1410886329924194309 …
-
-
Haha, that's indeed more tricky. In this particular case, sharing is allowed so again, they don't do anything wrong imo. However, it shows me that I'd have to be very careful on how much of this generated code I can actually use in my project
-
But sharing requires that the resulting code be GPL licensed! And Mr. Ronacher was showing that the _wrong license_ was emitted along with the code. This is a very clear license violation, in my opinion.
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
Yeah I saw this. Hopefully this is an exception and not the rule. If I write an is_odd function and it happens to be the exact same code as another open source project, did I break their license?
-
Such a function is trivial and cannot be copyrighted.
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
So I think that's more of a sign to me not to use it as a developer, rather than being concerned that they read my code I shared publicly
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.