oh my gods. they literally have no shame about this. GitHub Support just straight up confirmed in an email that yes, they used all public GitHub code, for Codex/Copilot regardless of license.pic.twitter.com/pFTqbvnTEK
Diesen Thread anzeigen
-
Training an AI based on information doesnt mean copying the code / violating licenses. Take a look at how the copilot network works - its not much different than a human looking at your (public) code and learning from it
That's not true - unlike a human, it does not conceptually understand the material. Rather, it is a set of weighted dice which sometimes produce useful results. Also, it clearly does contain copies of at least some of the training set, because it can regurgitate verbatim.
-
-
Actually, that is debatable. There is no clear precedent for that. We would need now to define if a license protects the code against that or if it don't.
-
The whole thing is dubious at best, it is essentially offloading the task of "taking inspiration" from existing source code to AI that really doesn't understand what the code does. You can learn *what* a code snippet is doing and figure out *how* to do the same without copying it
- Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.