oh my gods. they literally have no shame about this. GitHub Support just straight up confirmed in an email that yes, they used all public GitHub code, for Codex/Copilot regardless of license.pic.twitter.com/pFTqbvnTEK
Diesen Thread anzeigen
-
Maybe I'm not understanding the situation properly but isn't using the code as training set read only? Is there a difference between reading the public code and using it as training data? As far as I know all licenses allow me to read the code without doing anything else with it.
Sure - reading is fine. If you download the repo and change even one letter, then send it to your friend, you now are covered by the GPL. They downloaded the repos, and they changed more than one letter.
-
-
I don't know what they did to it but yeah they have to comply to the license. I expected Github of all places to be a frontrunner on that front.
Danke! Twitter wird dies nutzen, um deine Timeline zu verbessern. Rückgängig machenRückgängig machen
-
-
-
But if I understand this correctly, they didn't change anything. The code copilot outputs should be unique.
-
But if you removed all the GPL code from the training set, surely CoPilot would return different results; therefore is CoPilot not depending upon the GPL code and as a derivative work would have to be releases as GPL itself?
- Antworten anzeigen
Neue Unterhaltung -
-
-
You uploaded the code to their servers with the request to make it available for everybody to read (you created a public repo). They read and learn from it, just like any other dev that reads code. They high likely won't reproduce exact snippets from any code read
-
Except they themselves have documented that on occasion it does reproduce exact snippets.
Ende der Unterhaltung
Neue Unterhaltung -
Das Laden scheint etwas zu dauern.
Twitter ist möglicherweise überlastet oder hat einen vorübergehenden Schluckauf. Probiere es erneut oder besuche Twitter Status für weitere Informationen.